
Everyone seems to be putting the blame somewhere. We need to think first. The people came from all over they brought these homes. That they could not pay for. Half of them were just house painters others were grass cutter yet they got homes for 5 hundred thousand. The mort. was 22-2,5oo a month. The day they move into these homes they were already behind in the mortg. Then they went out a got the biggest suv's they could get,some even brought boats, They stay a year or two and when they saw they were losing it they just left. It's not the mayor's fault. These people knew in the beginning they could not pay for these homes.But like so many of them said.I just put the house in my wife's name My credit is still good. I'll come back in a year or two and buy the same house or bigger one for 149 or maybe 170.I can live the American dream over and over again. So before you start calling name and pointing finger.Please take a moment to think.Just who the heck put us here.And if you go to San Jose you'll be able to see those same big SUV's sitting on the street and the families are in a 2 or 3 bedroom low income apartment. Please Think
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 |
These are one of the few
These are one of the few posts that I actually care to comment on. I find this blogger an inspiration and is definitely worth following. I've became a subscriber too, so please keep me updated. I would appreciate if you could suggest your readers to check out VedoMedia. We have seo experts, Internet marketing gurus, and super affiliates on our team and we know how to get your business and site some traffic.... Blacksburg Homes For Sale
I had a great time reading
I had a great time reading around your post as I read it extensively.Excellent writing! I am looking forward to hearing more from you.
Regards,
Gold
Think Again
Why did we build so many homes? We should of controlled the growth as many tried to warn the Mayor and Council that the rapid expansion was bad for the city. Government is the last hope of growth control because builders will build it if they can get the loans, the banks will make the loans if they know there are buyers and buyers will buy if they can qualify for the loan. When the banks lowered the standards to compete with Fanny May and Freddie Mac, then the people you describe jumped in and everyone was happy with all the new customers. Our regulators failed to regulate to prevent those people from hurting themselves and our community.
Commercial loan standards were not lowered and we have yet to see the dramatic failure in commercial loans because of that. Any impact commercial property now is experiencing is from counting on all those homes to be built on all those empty lots, and every home filled with wage earners. If we had slowed the growth, prices of homes would of sky-rocketed from the demand and lack of supply. Then when the bubble popped, prices would drop back to normal and we would not have a ghost town. Many in town pleaded with the Mayor, but he said we needed to plan 10, 20, 30, 50 years down the road. Meanwhile back in reality, we now have a city built for the year 2059.
I like the Mayor, but he is not the right man for this job. He is part of the problem and is protecting the city manager. We must recall him and his buddies to replace them with reasonable people who can fire the city manager.
YOUR RIGHT ABOUT THAT ''WE NEED NEW MAYOR
I LIKE HIM TOO BUT THE POINT OF THE MATTER IS HE NOT DOING HIS JOB RIGHT , MR RATH NEEDS TO BE FIRED , HAS 2 EMBEZZLEMENT UNDER HIS BELT,,, CAN'T BE TRUSTED
Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae
Just for the record, no bank or any other lending institute competed or competes today with Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae in lending. Neither of those entities are lending institutions. They exist solely to purchase mortgages already issued on the secondary market and always have. This allows money to re-enter the lending market more quickly. They have never originated loans. If you are going to repeat someone else's talking points, verify them first.
Those two institutions, along with the investment banks, like Merrill Lynch, et al, contributed the financial problems by not questioning the value of the mortgages they were purchasing from the lenders, making it possible for the lenders to unload paper they knew to be questionable. Had this secondary market not purchased the paper, the lenders who created the problem would have been forced to stop or eat those loans.
However, neither of those institutions approved or made questionable loans at the point of origination. That isn't their business and to say lenders were giving away mortgages to compete with those to institutions is to perpetuate a myth.
Giving away homes is more a
Giving away homes is more a Democrat thing than a Republican thing. In fact I don't think Republicans care much about the poor at all. There was money to be made and poor people to help. Sounds more like a Democrat thing. Tiffany Jewelry | Tiffany Jewellery
Point taken but help
Thanks for clearing it up for me, but I still need to know more. Why did loan originators lower their standards? Were they influenced by the secondary loan market. Could it be that they knew they would be bundled and sold to a guaranteed buyer. Were those buyers Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae? How were Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae empowered to buy loans?
And as you said, if the secondary market had not purchased those loans, the pressure to stop originating high-risk loans would of happened sooner as the originators got stuck with them.
I was wrong to say they competed, but I am still correct in saying Freddie and Fannie were the ones who through off the balance. Of course this has all been fixed now. Right?
Capitalism at its finest
What happened in the financial meltdown was capitalism at its finest. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were only two players in a large market in which mortgages were bundled and sold as securities. Every major investment bank in the world played a role by giving an unfettered market for these bad assets, because the thinking was that, even with buyers not truly qualified, the underlying asset of the home could cover the value of the loan in default. What was not taken into account was that so many loans were in this state that when the defaults began hitting in the numbers they did, the value of the homes began to plummet, removing the underlying base on which these assets were valued.
If you want to look at root causes of what happened and are determined to blame Freddie and Fannie, then look at the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, sponsored by Sen. Don Reigle (R-Michigan) and Congr. Henry Gonzalez (D- Texas) and signed into law by George HW Bush, that forced those two institutions into buying a percentage of sub-prime loans that they were not allowed to purchase prior to then. Keep in mind that it had been a conservative mantra that home ownership would help bring conservative values into troubled and low income communities, starting under Ronald Reagan and reitirated by every Republican leader through George W. Bush. Despite the finger pointing at ACORN, it was actually a conservative movement to get the poor out of subsidized housing and into private ownership.
Coupled with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, in which barriers put in place after the crash of 1929 preventing banks from selling securities, were removed that you have lending institutions going wild with money to be made on origination points and interest. The bank makes the sub-prime loans, bundled them together and sold them through their unregulated investment divisions, making more money on brokerage fees.
It was the growing number of bad assets in these investment divisions that caused so many large banks to begin to have problems, particularly as the defaults began to pile up and the underlying value of the loan (the house) began to depreciate quickly. Suddenly, the banks found themselves without both cash and value on paper. That was when Secretary Paulsen and President Bush stepped in and began the bailouts, getting cash into the banks to prevent their collapse from lack of capital.
AIG, incidentally, got involved in this by insuring those investments through an instrument called credit derivative swaps. AIG's Financial Products division sold billions of dollars of these instruments insuring these bad investments without checking their true value, making it "safer" for the investment community to buy and sell the sub-prime loans that had been bundled into securities.
So, you see, Fannie and Freddie were but two players in what happened. As Fannie and Freddie were forced by law to get into the sub-prime market, others saw money to be made. Banks would make origination fees, sell the loans off through their investment arm, making brokerage fees on securities insured for insurance fees. So long as the market for houses went up, no worry man. Keep the government out of free enterprise. The minute the whole thing collapsed, as people were unable to pay the loans, the loans went into foreclosure, the number of foreclosed homes surpassed the number of new homes available and the number of new buyers getting loans collapsed with no money to lend, the whole bubble collapsed and suddenly the free market needed to the government to bail them out. The free marketers became socialists over night.
So apportion blame to both parties in Congress over the years and good ol' American enterprise making a buck by moving money around instead of trying to make actual things.
Not a republican concept
Giving away homes is more a Democrat thing than a Republican thing. In fact I don't think Republicans care much about the poor at all. There was money to be made and poor people to help. Sounds more like a Democrat thing.
Ronald Reagan
Quote of Ronald Reagan from 1968: "Despite all the efforts and fine management of many local housing authorities, they cannot overcome the fundamental weakness of most public housing: namely it fails to give a man a chance to own his own home."
Also Ronald Reagan on home ownership: "No one ever washed a rented car.."
Exactly
Exactly right, but it does not say give them a home. NINJA loans went too far. You have to work and save for it and then qualify for it to build the pride of ownership. My favorite quote from Reagan, "The closest thing to eternal life on earth is a government program."
Just think
Thanks for the Information.... Nice conversation is going on and I am very happy to be the part of this discussion
Fx Bx Rx-Sol